Resonant trans-Neptunian object

In astronomy, a resonant trans-Neptunian object is a trans-Neptunian object (TNO) in mean motion orbital resonance with Neptune. The orbital periods of the resonant objects are in a simple integer relations with the period of Neptune e.g. 1:2, 2:3 etc.^†

Distribution of trans-Neptunian Objects. Resonant objects in red.

Distribution

The diagram illustrates the distribution of the known trans-Neptunian objects (up to 70 AU) in relation to the orbits of the planets together with Centaurs for reference. Resonant objects are plotted in red. Orbital resonances with Neptune are marked with vertical bars; 1:1 marks the position of Neptune’s orbit (and its Neptune Trojans), 2:3 marks the orbit of Pluto and plutinos, 1:2, 2:5 etc. a number of smaller families).

^†The designation 2:3 or 3:2 refer both to the same resonance for TNOs. There’s no confusion possible as TNO, by definition, have periods longer than Neptune. The usage depends on the author and the field of research. The statement Pluto is in 2:3 resonance to Neptune appears to better capture the meaning: Pluto completes 2 orbits for every 3 orbits of Neptune.

Origin

Detailed analytical and numerical studies of the Neptune’s resonances have shown that they are quite narrow i.e. the objects must have a relatively precise range of energy (i.e. semi-major axes). If the object semi-major axis is outside these narrow ranges, the orbit becomes chaotic (widely changing orbital elements). Curiously, substantial numbers^† of TNO being discovered appeared to be in 2:3 resonances , the proportion far from random distribution. It is now believed that the objects have been collected from wider distances by the sweeping resonances during the migration of Neptune. Well before the discovery of the first TNO, it was suggested that interaction between giant planets and a massive disk of small particles would, via momentum transfer, make Jupiter migrate inwards and while Saturn, Uranus and especially Neptune would migrate outwards. During this relatively short period of time, Neptune’s resonances, would be sweeping the space, trapping objects on initially varying heliocentric orbits into resonance.

^†More than 10% are classified or suspected plutinos

Known populations

2:3 resonance (Plutinos)

File:ThePlutinos Size Albedo Color2.svg

Pluto and its moons (top) compared in size, albedo and colour with Orcus and Ixion.

The 2:3 resonance is by far the dominant category among the resonant objects, with 92 confirmed and 104 possible member bodies. The objects following orbits in this resonance are named plutinos, after Pluto which has the first known orbit of this type. Large, numbered plutinos include:

• 90482 Orcus
• 28978 Ixion
• (84922) 2003 VS₂
• 38628 Huya

1:2 resonance

This resonance is often considered as the outer "edge" of the Kuiper Belt and the objects in this resonance are sometimes referred to as twotinos. There are far fewer objects in this resonance than plutinos.(Total of 14 as of September 27, 2006)

Objects with well established orbits include:

• (20161) 1996 TR₆₆
• (26308) 1998 SM₁₆₅
• (119979) 2002 WC₁₉
• (130391) 2000 JG₈₁

File:TheResonantTNO 73AU.svg

Selected resonant objects (in red).

2:5 resonance

Objects with well established orbits, include:

• (84522) 2002 TC₃₀₂, the largest
• (38084) 1999 HB₁₂
• (60621) 2000 FE₈
• (69988) 1998 WA₃₁
• (119068) 2001 KC₇₇

Neptune trojans

A few objects follow orbits with similar semi-major axis as Neptune, near Lagrangian points. These Neptune Trojans, so called par analogy with Trojan asteroids. They can be formally considered in 1:1 resonance with Neptune. Five are known as of December 2006:

• 2001 QR₃₂₂
• 2004 UP₁₀
• 2005 TN₅₃
• 2005 TO₇₄
• 2006 RJ₁₀₃

Other resonances

So called higher-order resonances are known for a limited number of objects, including the following numbered objects

• 3:4 (15836) 1995 DA₂
• 3:5 (15809) 1994 JS
• 4:7 (119070) 2001 KP₇₇, (118698) 2000 OY₅₁
• 3:7 (95625) 2002 GX₃₂

Toward a formal definition

The classes of TNO have no universally agreed precise definitions, the boundaries are often unclear and the notion of resonance is not defined precisely. The Deep Ecliptic Survey introduced formally defined dynamical classes based on long-term forward integration of orbits under the combined perturbations from all four giant planets. (see also formal definition of classical KBO)

It should be noted that in general, the mean motion resonance can involve not only orbital periods of the form

$\rm p\cdot\lambda - \rm q\cdot\lambda_{\rm N}$

where p and q are small integers, λ and λ_N are repectively the mean longitudes of the object and Neptune but can also involve the longitude of the perihelion and the longitudes of the nodes (see orbital resonance, for elementary examples)

An object is Resonant^† if for some small integers p,q,n,m,r,s, the argument (angle) defined below is librating (i.e. is bounded)

$\phi = \rm p\cdot\lambda - \rm q\cdot\lambda_{\rm N} - \rm m\cdot\varpi - \rm n\cdot\Omega - \rm r\cdot\varpi_{\rm N} -\rm s\cdot\Omega_{\rm N}$

where the $\varpi$ are the longitudes of perihelia and the $\Omega$ are the longitudes of the ascending nodes, for Neptune (with subscripts "N") and the resonant object (no subscripts).

The term libration denotes here periodic oscillation of the angle around some value and is opposed to circulation where the angle can take all values from 0 to 360°. For example, in the case of Pluto, the resonant angle $\phi$ librates around 180° with an amplitude of around 82° degrees, ie. the angle changes periodically from 180°-82° to 180°+82°.

All new plutinos discovered during the Deep Ecliptic Survey proved to be of the type

$\phi = \rm 3\cdot\lambda - \rm 2\cdot\lambda_{\rm N} - \varpi$

similar or Pluto's mean motion resonance.

More generally, this 2:3 resonance is an example of the resonances p:(p+1) (example 1:2, 2:3, 3:4 etc.) that have proved to lead to stable orbits. Their resonant angle is

$\phi = \rm p\cdot\lambda - \rm q\cdot\lambda_{\rm N} - (\rm p-\rm q)\cdot\varpi$

In this case, the importance of the resonant angle $\phi \,$ can be understood by noting that when the object is at perihelion i.e. $\lambda = \varpi$ then

$\phi = q\cdot ( \varpi - \lambda_{\rm N})$

i.e. $\phi \,$ gives a measure of the distance of the object's perihelion from Neptune. The object is protected from the perturbation by keeping its perihelion far from Neptune provided $\phi \,$ librates around an angle far from 0°.

^†Capital R is used to refer to this formally defined class as opposed to common meaning of resonant

Further reading

• (2004-08-03) John K. Davies and Luis H. Barrera The First Decadal Review of the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt. Springer. ISBN 1-4020-1781-2.
• E. I. Chiang, J. R. Lovering, R. L. Millis, M. W. Buie, L. H. Wasserman, and K. J. Meech (June 2003). "Resonant and Secular Families of the Kuiper Belt". Earth, Moon, and Planets 92 (1–4): 49–62. DOI:10.1023/B:MOON.0000031924.20073.d0.
• E. I. Chiang, A. B. Jordan, R. L. Millis, M. W. Buie, L. H. Wasserman, J. L. Elliot, S. D. Kern, D. E. Trilling, K. J. Meech, and R. M. Wagner (2003-01-21). "Resonance occupation in the Kuiper Belt: case examples of the 5:2 and trojan resonances". The Astronomical Journal 126: 430–443.
• Renu Malhotra. "The Kuiper Belt as a Debris Disk" (PDF). (as HTML)